ArticleBMJ case reports2026
Spontaneous posterior uterine rupture following vaginal delivery in an unscarred uterus.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary uterine rupture, defined as rupture of an unscarred uterus during pregnancy or delivery, is a rare but catastrophic obstetric emergency. The estimated incidence is approximately 1 in 16 840-19 765 deliveries in developed nations. We report a case of a multiparous woman in her early 30s who presented in spontaneous labour and developed haemorrhagic shock following an apparently uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Rapid recognition of concealed bleeding led to emergent laparotomy, revealing a left posterior uterine wall rupture involving the venous plexus. Surgical control with supracervical hysterectomy and multidisciplinary management-including interventional radiology review at a tertiary centre-achieved complete haemostasis and recovery. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and rapid escalation when postpartum bleeding persists despite standard therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.