ArticleActa biomaterialia2026
Stent-graft compliance modulates regional mechanical and structural remodeling of the aorta.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endovascular aortic stent-grafts often introduce a compliance mismatch with the native aorta, potentially leading to adverse remodeling. This study assessed how stent-graft compliance affects structural, mechanical, and morphometric adaptation in a porcine model by comparing a conventional stiff polyethylene terephthalate stent-graft (CS-SG) to a compliant nanofibrillar stent-graft (NF-SG). Four months after implantation, aortas were harvested and systematically analyzed. Morphometric assessment of aortic rings, planar biaxial mechanical testing, and quantification of elastin, collagen, and smooth muscle cell (SMC) densities were performed. Remodeling with the CS-SG was primarily localized to regions under stent contact and included increased collagen accumulation (∼25-30 % vs. ∼15 % in the inner media), elastin compaction, significant loss of SMCs (∼10-15 % vs. ∼20-25 % in inner media), and thick neointima formation. These changes were associated with increased aortic stiffness (0.47 MPa vs. 0.37 MPa) and loss of non-linearity, especially in distal stented segments, while remote regions exhibited minimal alterations. In contrast, NF-SG implantation was associated with fewer localized structural and mechanical changes, including preserved SMC density, reduced collagen accumulation, reduced neointima formation, and maintained compliance at stented and adjacent regions. Overall, these findings suggest that compliant stent-grafts may mitigate localized adverse remodeling at stent-tissue interfaces compared to conventional stiff devices. These results highlight the potential importance of compliance-matching in stent-graft design, although broader effects across the aorta were limited within the four-month observation period. Future studies in diseased and aged models with extended follow-up are warranted. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This study quantifies morphological, mechanical, and structural changes in the porcine aorta four months after implantation of either a stiff or a compliant stent-graft. Aortic remodeling was highly localized, occurring primarily in the stented and distal segments, with minimal changes in regions remote from the stent-graft. Our results demonstrate that compliant stent-grafts better preserve aortic structure, smooth muscle cell density, and mechanical function compared to stiff devices, which induce pronounced pathological changes in areas directly exposed to stent contact. These findings underscore the clinical importance of designing more compliant stent-grafts to mitigate adverse vascular remodeling and improve long-term outcomes after endovascular aortic repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.