ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2026
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and its expanding clinical indications.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) that was initially developed for patients with prohibitive surgical risk. Since the first-in-human procedure in 2002, TAVI has gained global acceptance owing to its favorable clinical outcomes and faster recovery than those associated with surgical aortic valve replacement. Landmark trials have demonstrated the noninferiority or superiority of TAVI across high-, intermediate-, and low-surgical risk populations, leading to guideline endorsement as a recommended option for appropriately selected patients across all surgical risk groups. Furthermore, long-term follow-up data support the durability of contemporary TAVI devices. Beyond its current established indications, TAVI is being explored for broader applications such as asymptomatic severe AS, moderate AS with heart failure, and pure aortic regurgitation; however, these uses remain investigational and are not yet part of formal guidelines. This review summarizes TAVI's historical evolution, pivotal clinical trial evidence, and procedural innovations that have enabled its widespread use. We explore Korea-specific experiences with TAVI implementation, highlighting national registry data, healthcare policy considerations, and institutional adoption. Future perspectives include long-term device performance, lifetime valve management strategies, and the integration of artificial intelligence into transcatheter valve therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.