Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730192›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026

Minimally invasive lateral tubular approach for revision of failed lumbar interbody fusion: illustrative cases.

Diana Chang, Yan Zhou, Dean Chou, Daniel C Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-1675
Yan ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7907-1148
Dean ChouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Daniel C LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-3672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterbody cage failure is associated with loss of disc height, nerve compression, and pseudarthrosis, and often requires reoperation. Revision of failed interbody cages is challenging due to subsidence of the cage into the adjacent endplates, causing bony defects and granulation tissue, resulting in difficult exposure and a higher risk of complications. OBSERVATIONS: In this case series, the authors present 2 cases of symptomatic interbody cage failure successfully revised using a minimally invasive lateral approach. The first case utilized a transpsoas lateral approach to replace a failed L2-3 cage from prior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The second case used an anterior-to-psoas oblique lateral approach to revise a subsided L3 corpectomy cage. Postoperatively, both patients had significant symptom improvement. LESSONS: A lateral lumbar interbody approach-with its direct access to disc space, possibility for a relatively large-footprint cage while avoiding scar tissue from a prior approach, and favorable safety profile-is a promising option for the revision of failed interbody cages. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25750.

Indexed as

cage subsidencecase reportlateral lumbar approachlumbar interbody fusionminimally invasive spine surgeryspinal revision surgery

Identifiers

PMID41730192
PMCPMC12927203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.