ReviewJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
Peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation: technical aspects, challenges, and current perspectives.
Review in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of peritoneal dialysis (PD) depends on securing a functional, safe, and durable peritoneal access. Over recent decades, important advances in catheter design and insertion techniques have been consolidated, with the Tenckhoff catheter remaining the most widely used. Nevertheless, the prevalence of PD in Brazil remains limited, hindered by technical and logistical barriers to catheter placement, as well as by delays between indication and procedure. This review critically examines the main approaches to establishing PD access, with emphasis on technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and complications. Conventional surgery provides direct visualization of the peritoneal cavity in a simple and safe manner, whereas percutaneous methods, particularly those guided by ultrasonography and fluoroscopy, shorten hospitalization and broaden applicability when performed by nephrologists. Comparative evidence shows that percutaneous approaches achieve low rates of infectious and mechanical complications, with satisfactory catheter survival, while videolaparoscopic placement appears to yield superior results among the most frequently adopted techniques, despite greater technical and logistical complexity. Study heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions, underscoring the need for robust randomized clinical trials. Systematic use of imaging guidance may improve technical accuracy, while the active involvement of nephrologists in the procedure is crucial for reducing delays, optimizing outcomes, and expanding PD utilization. Standardization of practices and wider adoption of minimally invasive techniques represent promising avenues for strengthening PD as a therapeutic modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.