Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730119›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Detectable global temperature responses to wildfires and volcanic eruptions.

Yaowei Li, Benjamin D Santer, Susan Solomon, David W J Thompson, Qiang Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Detectable global temperature responses to wildfires and volcanic eruptions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yaowei LiDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-0725-6108
Benjamin D SanterSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-460X
Susan SolomonDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-7581
David W J ThompsonSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
Qiang FuDepartment of Atmospheric and Climate Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0001-5371-8460

Funding

DOC | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NA23OAR4310383BNASA (NASA) 80NSSC23K0113NSF (NSF) AGS-2116186NSF (NSF) AGS-2202812NSF (NSF) AGS-2316980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large volcanic eruptions and intense wildfires perturb Earth's atmospheric temperature. Understanding the climate response to such natural forcings is essential for obtaining reliable estimates of its response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. While the climate impacts of volcanic sulfate aerosols are well documented, other natural forcings-including wildfire smoke reaching the stratosphere and water vapor injections from a submarine eruption-pose new challenges for detecting and attributing their atmospheric temperature impacts. Here, we demonstrate robust detection of statistically significant temperature anomalies in the troposphere and stratosphere using multidecadal satellite observations and internal variability estimates from a climate model ensemble and from observations. We analyze three landmark events: the 1991 Pinatubo eruption, the 2019-2020 Australian wildfires, and the 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption. Each leaves a fingerprint with distinct altitudinal, geographical, and temporal structure. The global-mean stratospheric signal from Australian wildfires is detectable even in time averages extending beyond 10 mo, despite injecting only ~5% of Pinatubo's aerosol mass. For Hunga Tonga, we detect significant and prolonged stratospheric cooling, but no robust tropospheric signal in the first 2 y. These findings show that both sulfate and nonsulfate stratospheric perturbations produce distinct, statistically identifiable global temperature signals. Accounting for such forcings in climate model simulations is therefore essential for improving comparisons of simulated and observed variability.

Indexed as

atmospheric temperatureclimate forcingsatellite and model datavolcanic eruptionswildfires

Identifiers

PMID41730119
PMCPMC12974422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.