ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Child exposure to animal feces and zoonotic pathogens in northwest Ecuador: A mixed-methods study.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Household determinants of animal and human fecal contamination on floors and hands in northwestern coastal Ecuador.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Microbial source tracking of human and animal fecal contamination in Ecuadorian households.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Socioecological drivers of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) choices: A qualitative analysis of maternal perspectives in northwest Ecuador.PLOS water · 2026Article
- Microbial source tracking of human and animal fecal contamination in Ecuadorian households.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), close cohabitation with animals and limited access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure increase the risk of zoonotic enteric pathogen transmission to young children. This mixed-methods study combined (A) microbiological analysis of 120 animal fecal samples, and (B) go-along, semi-structured interviews with 35 mothers of children under two years across urban (n = 10), intermediate (n = 15), and rural (n = 10) communities in Ecuador to investigate: (Q1) What zoonotic enteric pathogens are present in animal feces and at what concentrations? (Q2) How are children exposed to animals and their feces? and (Q3) Which animals may serve as key sources of child exposure? Microbiological analysis revealed high prevalence and concentrations of zoonotic pathogens, most commonly E. coli aEPEC (57%), Salmonella sp. (36%), and E. coli STEC (25%), with frequent co-infections (33%) and concentrations (4.97-9.29 log10 gc/g) often exceeding infectious dose thresholds. Qualitative findings showed risks from free-roaming animals, poor feces management, and frequent child-animal contact, often indirectly through caregivers and siblings. Triangulation identified chickens and dogs as the most likely potential exposure sources due to their behaviors, proximity to children, and pathogen carriage. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to limit animal roaming, improve animal feces management, and increase caregiver awareness, while underscoring how mixed-methods approaches can help identify context-specific exposure pathways that should be considered when designing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.