Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730045›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Child exposure to animal feces and zoonotic pathogens in northwest Ecuador: A mixed-methods study.

Viviana Albán, April M Ballard, Kelsey J Jesser, Gwenyth O Lee, Joseph N S Eisenberg, Daniel Garzon-Chavez, Gabriel Trueba, Bethany A Caruso, Karen Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Viviana AlbánInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7519-6683
April M BallardGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kelsey J JesserDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Gwenyth O LeeRutgers Global Health Institute and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Joseph N S EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Daniel Garzon-ChavezInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Gabriel TruebaInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Bethany A CarusoHubert Department of Global Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Karen LevyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-9401

Funding

Gut microbiome, enteric infections and child growth across a rurual urban gradientR01AI137679 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S., LEVY, KAREN · 2018 to 2023
$5.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), close cohabitation with animals and limited access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure increase the risk of zoonotic enteric pathogen transmission to young children. This mixed-methods study combined (A) microbiological analysis of 120 animal fecal samples, and (B) go-along, semi-structured interviews with 35 mothers of children under two years across urban (n = 10), intermediate (n = 15), and rural (n = 10) communities in Ecuador to investigate: (Q1) What zoonotic enteric pathogens are present in animal feces and at what concentrations? (Q2) How are children exposed to animals and their feces? and (Q3) Which animals may serve as key sources of child exposure? Microbiological analysis revealed high prevalence and concentrations of zoonotic pathogens, most commonly E. coli aEPEC (57%), Salmonella sp. (36%), and E. coli STEC (25%), with frequent co-infections (33%) and concentrations (4.97-9.29 log10 gc/g) often exceeding infectious dose thresholds. Qualitative findings showed risks from free-roaming animals, poor feces management, and frequent child-animal contact, often indirectly through caregivers and siblings. Triangulation identified chickens and dogs as the most likely potential exposure sources due to their behaviors, proximity to children, and pathogen carriage. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to limit animal roaming, improve animal feces management, and increase caregiver awareness, while underscoring how mixed-methods approaches can help identify context-specific exposure pathways that should be considered when designing interventions.

Indexed as

FecesZoonosesAdultAnimalsChild, PreschoolEcuadorEscherichia coliFemaleHumansInfantMaleRural PopulationSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID41730045
PMCPMC12956073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.