ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
How sleeping minds decide: State-specific reconfigurations of lexical decision-making.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep has traditionally been conceptualized as a state of cognitive disconnection, yet emerging evidence indicates that decision-making capacities persist across sleep stages. Here, we elucidate the computational mechanisms underlying real-time lexical decision-making during polysomnographically-verified sleep, using facial electromyography and hierarchical drift diffusion modeling in both healthy individuals and participants with narcolepsy. We found that lexical decision-making was preserved during N1 and lucid REM sleep, but relied on distinct computational strategies: in N1 sleep, both enhanced sensory-motor processing and increased evidence accumulation supported decisions about words, whereas in lucid REM sleep, lexical decisions were driven exclusively by evidence accumulation processes. Cross-state comparisons revealed two fundamental principles: (1) Selective preservation-during N1 sleep, lexical decisions for words were maintained while those for pseudowords were selectively impaired, indicating that cognitive resources during sleep are preferentially allocated to meaningful stimuli; (2) Parallel strategic adaptations-during lucid REM sleep, participants increased their decision thresholds, requiring more evidence before responding, which helped maintain accuracy even though the efficiency of evidence accumulation was reduced. Our findings demonstrate that, rather than a passive decline, sleep involves dynamic and state-specific reconfiguration of the computational mechanisms underlying decision-making, with important implications for understanding consciousness and cognitive flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.