Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730018›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Developing objective tools to study rock hyrax (Procavia capensis) behaviour in the field.

Héloïse Brotier, Pablo Alba-Gonzalez, Prameek Kannan, Eli Geffen, Amiyaal Ilany, Lee Koren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Héloïse BrotierFaculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Pablo Alba-GonzalezSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Prameek KannanFaculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Eli GeffenSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amiyaal IlanySchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Lee KorenFaculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-501X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal behaviour research seeks methodological rigor and consistency within and across studies, yet maintaining shared standards requires continual evaluation. The rock hyrax (Procavia capensis) is a social mammal whose behaviour has been widely studied, but no standardized methodological ethogram currently exists for this species. Here, we developed an ethogram for the rock hyrax using a procedure designed to produce objective and reproducible behavioural classifications. We observed and filmed four groups of rock hyrax using focal animal sampling and constructed the ethogram based on two organizational rules: the level of behavioural description and the behavioural units. We identified 42 distinct behaviours and grouped them into six behavioural categories based on context. This grouping was statistically validated using correspondence analysis, multidimensional unfolding, and a cluster variables algorithm. In addition, we performed a biological validation by comparing seasonal behavioural patterns with those reported in previous studies of this system. The resulting ethogram, together with its validated behavioural categories, provides a standardized framework that can improve objectivity and consistency in future studies of rock hyrax behaviour. The approach described here is broadly applicable to other species and may facilitate comparative research across taxa.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHyraxesAnimalsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID41730018
PMCPMC12928569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.