ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of hyper-attenuated S19 poliovirus strains for use in poliovirus neutralization assays.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poliovirus eradication efforts have relied on effective vaccination campaigns and stringent laboratory containment of poliovirus strains. Serological testing is the primary means to address population immunity, vaccine efficacy, and individual poliovirus exposures. However, strict containment requirements for Sabin type 2 and wild poliovirus types 2 & 3 limit access to serological testing. To address these limitations, we evaluated the performance of hyper-attenuated, temperature-sensitive S19 poliovirus strains (S19-PV), which retain the antigenic characteristics of Sabin and Salk strains but can be handled under biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) conditions. Using a modified microneutralization assay, we performed a comparative validation of S19-PVs to their Sabin and wild-type counterparts using WHO international standards, in-house control reagents, and human sera. Neutralizing antibody titers showed strong concordance between S19-PV and reference strains (R² = 0.93-0.99), with high intra- and inter-assay reproducibility (CVs < 10%). Our findings demonstrate that S19-PV strains are antigenically equivalent to Sabin and wild-type viruses and suitable for use in neutralization assays to determine levels of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies outside of strict containment laboratories. Adoption of these strains can significantly expand global capacity for poliovirus serological testing, supporting surveillance and immunization activities in the final stages of poliovirus eradication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.