Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729980›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Facilitators and barriers to the formulation of public policies on food and nutrition: A scoping review.

Ana Carolina Feldenheimer da Silva, Andhressa Araújo Fagundes, Cintia Chaves Curioni, Clara Cecília Ribeiro de Sá, Gabriela Buccini, Maína Ribeiro Pereira-Castro, Mariana Souza Lopes, Luana Lara Rocha, Fernando Marcello Nunes Pereira, Elisabetta Recine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Carolina Feldenheimer da SilvaDepartment of Social Nutrition, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-8856
Andhressa Araújo FagundesPostgraduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Cintia Chaves CurioniDepartment of Social Nutrition, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Clara Cecília Ribeiro de SáPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
Gabriela BucciniDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6008-0987
Maína Ribeiro Pereira-CastroFaculty of Education and Health Sciences, University Center of Brasília, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Mariana Souza LopesDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Luana Lara RochaDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5963-6033
Fernando Marcello Nunes PereiraDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Elisabetta RecineDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review aims to identify facilitators and barriers to the formulation of public policies on food and nutrition across different contexts. The Scope review was conducted in seven databases. The search strategy was designed using research terms (and their derivatives) and included combinations of 'nutrition', 'food', 'policy', 'guideline', 'action plan', 'strategy', and 'process'. All stages of data selection and extraction were independently performed by pairs of researchers. A narrative synthesis was developed to present the findings. A total of 17 articles were published in scientific journals, containing data from 28 countries across five continents (Africa, North and South America, Asia, Europe, and Oceania). The studies, published between 1979 and 2023, documented processes for developing policies, programs, and public plans for food and nutrition. The facilitators and barriers described in the policy development process were identified, and they were grouped into seven categories: (1) governance, (2) intersectoral negotiations, (3) political will, (4) policy characteristics, (5) team profile, (6) availability and use of data, and (7) conflict of interest and interference from the private sector. Except for conflict of interest, all categories were pointed out as elements that can potentially facilitate or hinder the policy development process. Understanding the facilitators and barriers to public policy formulation can impact the development process, such as reducing development time or formulating responses that are better aligned with the needs of the population. Policymakers can develop strategies to minimize the impact of barriers and leverage facilitators to develop more efficient policies with better outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41729980
PMCPMC12928400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.