Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729953›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2026

Prevalence and spectrum of homologous recombination repair mutations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer from India.

Hemavathi Baskarane, Rishabh Jain, Mohit Kumar Divakar, Amlesh Seth, Brusabhanu Nayak, Sameer Bakhshi, Ranjit Kumar Sahoo, Akash Kumar, Aparna Sharma, Seema Kaushal and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hemavathi BaskaraneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0946-8518
Rishabh JainDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mohit Kumar DivakarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Amlesh SethDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Brusabhanu NayakDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Sameer BakhshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ranjit Kumar SahooDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Akash KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aparna SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Seema KaushalDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kunhi Parambath HareshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Vishakha HoodaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Payal VasudevaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pranav Pratap SinghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rishika AgarwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sanskriti VasundharaUniversity College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110095, India.
Neeraj AgarwalDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1076-0428
Atul BatraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1934-8408

Funding

ICMR 5/13/31/AB/ICRC/2022-NCD-III
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlterations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR) occur in approximately 20%-25% of patients with metastatic prostate cancer and are associated with aggressive biology, poor outcomes, and potential sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). However, frequency and variations in somatic HRR mutations in the Indian population are unknown.

methodsWe analyzed somatic HRR alterations in patients at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, between 2022 and November 2024. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 15 HRR genes was performed on tumor tissue samples. Demographic and clinicopathological variables were retrieved from medical records, and their associations were assessed.

resultsOf 247 patients tested, 167 were evaluable (32.3% tissue failure due to poor DNA yield). Sixty-eight pathogenic HRR alterations were detected across 51 patients (30.5%). ATM was the most frequently altered gene (13.2%), followed by BRCA1 (5.3%), BRCA2 (4.2%), and CDK12 (4.2%). Variants of unknown significance (VUS) were detected in 12% (20) of patients. Patients with HRR alterations had higher baseline PSA values compared with the non-HRR cohort (median 150 vs 100 ng/mL, P = .012). No significant associations were observed with age, Gleason score, disease volume or risk category, or visceral metastases.

conclusionsThis study provides the first comprehensive dataset on the spectrum of somatic HRR mutations in Indian patients with prostate cancer. The prevalence (30.5%) was somewhat higher than the global studies, ATM was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by BRCA1, in contrast to Western and Asian cohorts, where BRCA2 predominates. These findings suggest potential population-specific variations and underscore the need for broader HRR testing to better delineate the genomic landscape of prostate cancer in Indian patients.

Indexed as

MutationProstatic NeoplasmsRecombinational DNA RepairAgedAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCyclin-Dependent KinasesHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrevalenceAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCDK12 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent KinasesATMgenomic profilinghomologous recombination repairIndian populationmetastatic prostate cancerpathogenic variantsomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID41729953
PMCPMC12986755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.