Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729922›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Exploring sleep in farmed ungulates: A scoping review protocol.

Gustavo Dias, Emma Ternman, Kathryn Proudfoot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gustavo DiasDepartment of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-6043
Emma TernmanDepartment of Production and Welfare, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Steinkjer, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-8621
Kathryn ProudfootDepartment of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-2431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep is essential to the life of all animals and has been broadly studied in humans and laboratory animals, although less explored in other species. Sleep may influence various aspects of an animal's welfare, including their health, behaviour and mental states. Some researchers have begun to investigate sleep in farmed ungulates, including the role that sleep may play in animal welfare. This protocol aims to outline the methods of a scoping review aimed at describing sleep studies in farmed ungulates. The proposed scoping review aims to 1) map existing studies on sleep in farmed ungulates, 2) explore the animal welfare implications of this sleep research, and 3) identify knowledge gaps in need of future research. The PRISMA-P guidelines extension for scoping reviews will be followed, and the data will be made publicly available at the time of publication. A search will be performed in three databases: CAB Abstracts, PubMed, and Scopus. Articles will be screened using Covidence software and included if they measured sleep in species of farmed ungulates. The results will be reported using a descriptive synthesis of published sleep studies in farmed ungulates, including a timeline of when studies were published, the species and other characteristics of animals included, methods used to estimate sleep, and how sleep related to animal welfare outcomes.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticSleepAnimalsAnimal WelfareScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41729922
PMCPMC12928474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.