Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729912›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Experiences of women with disabilities during and after COVID-19: Needs, sources of support and implications for policy and practice.

Adi Finkelstein, Sara Genut, Anat Golos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adi FinkelsteinSelma Jelinek School of Nursing, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-5254
Sara GenutDepartment of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7437-2438
Anat GolosSchool of Occupational Therapy, The Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-615X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 700 million women and girls worldwide live with disabilities, facing compounded discrimination due to both gender and disability. Despite their large numbers, they are often excluded from decision-making and rendered invisible. Research shows that crisis such as nature disasters and public health crises affects people with disabilities more severely than the general population, and women more than men. Yet, studies focusing specifically on women with disabilities in such contexts remain scarce. The present qualitative study aimed to address this gap by analyzing 56 semi-structured interviews with women with motor and/or sensory impairments about their life experiences during COVID-19 and afterwards, using reflexive thematic analysis. Participants aged 26-69, mostly with motor impairments (66.1%), reported satisfaction with their health (71.4%). Findings are organized into four main themes and six sub-themes corresponding to the components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as follows: Physical and mental health through daily care and environmental contexts; Navigating accessibility and attitudinal barriers in daily life; Maintaining decision-making autonomy and financial independence; Family and social relationships as sources of support. The findings demonstrate multifaceted impacts on women with disabilities across personal, social, and contextual domains, during both stable periods and crises. To effectively address their needs, policymakers should incorporate the perspectives of women with disabilities in the planning of support programs for both routine periods and crises responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesAdultAgedDecision MakingDisability DiscriminationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Social Support

Identifiers

PMID41729912
PMCPMC12928392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.