ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Risk factors for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL): Challenges in understanding pathophysiology.
Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From visceral to visible: A systematic review and meta-analysis of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes in Eastern Africa.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Role of chemokines and their receptors in lesional CD8⁺ T cell homing in Indian Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) occurs mainly in Eastern Africa (EA) and the Southeast Asia region (SEAR), but with important differences. In EA PKDL occurs in young children shortly after treatment of VL (within 1-13 months) when the immune response to leishmania is developing. In contrast, in the SEAR VL and PKDL occur in adolescents and young adults with an interval of 1-4 years or more after successful VL treatment with possible downgrading of the immune response. The risk factors for PKDL in both regions are poorly understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsFrom a literature search, data was extracted with regard to risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, immune responses, or co-infections in PKDL. Among host factors, young age and male gender are risk factors in EA, and in both EA and the SEAR decreased expression of the IFNGR1 was found in PKDL but not VL. Parasite-related factors included differences in strains of VL and PKDL as well as co-infection with symbionts such as Leptomonas seymouri. Previous treatment of VL was a major risk factor in Sudan, India, and Bangladesh. PK and PD of drugs used in VL and PKDL may differ. Environmental factors include naturally occurring arsenic and exposure to UV light. Lastly, co-infection with other microbes is not uncommon and may result in downgrading of the immune response after successful VL treatment in the SEAR. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: A better understanding of the pathophysiology in PKDL is needed to describe factors that influence (excessive) upgrading or downgrading of the immune response. For control efforts, optimalization of VL treatment (multidrug approach, immune modifiers) may result a stronger immune response and therefore lower PKDL rates. Lastly, the approach to PKDL should be integrated in a joint skin disease approach to look for risk factors such as co-infection with a strategy for combined management and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.