ArticleJournal of animal science2026
A random regression model for total litter weight in mice.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring litter weight (LW) as a summary trait in multiparous animal species is less cost-intensive than individual birth weight. We propose a random regression model for total LW, where the genetic effects of dams and sires are modeled as linear random regression slopes on litter size with potentially different variances. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components was conducted separately for four diverse mouse lines, and the results were compared. In total, there were 11,430 total LWs, representing 175,446 pups. The sire genetic variance component was significant in two lines. The random regression model implies that the heritability of the trait and the reliability of estimated genetic effects depend on litter size, in contrast to previously used models. When averaged over different litter sizes, heritability for total LW was moderate to low at 0.32 in the unselected control line FZTDU, at 0.19 in the growth-selected line DU6, and at 0.14 and 0.12 in the high-fecundity lines DUC and DUK, respectively. In conclusion, the proposed random regression model makes more detailed use of the information available in total LW data. It provides potential applications in other multiparous species, for a cost-effective selection for birth weight using LW data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.