Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729880›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

A random regression model for total litter weight in mice.

Ricarda Elisabeth Jahnel, Martina Langhammer, Norbert Reinsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricarda Elisabeth JahnelResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf 18196, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4638-2046
Martina LanghammerResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf 18196, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6266-9533
Norbert ReinschResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf 18196, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-4088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring litter weight (LW) as a summary trait in multiparous animal species is less cost-intensive than individual birth weight. We propose a random regression model for total LW, where the genetic effects of dams and sires are modeled as linear random regression slopes on litter size with potentially different variances. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components was conducted separately for four diverse mouse lines, and the results were compared. In total, there were 11,430 total LWs, representing 175,446 pups. The sire genetic variance component was significant in two lines. The random regression model implies that the heritability of the trait and the reliability of estimated genetic effects depend on litter size, in contrast to previously used models. When averaged over different litter sizes, heritability for total LW was moderate to low at 0.32 in the unselected control line FZTDU, at 0.19 in the growth-selected line DU6, and at 0.14 and 0.12 in the high-fecundity lines DUC and DUK, respectively. In conclusion, the proposed random regression model makes more detailed use of the information available in total LW data. It provides potential applications in other multiparous species, for a cost-effective selection for birth weight using LW data.

Indexed as

Birth WeightLitter SizeAnimalsFemaleMaleMicePregnancyRegression Analysisbirth weightdirect genetic effectslitter traitsmaternal genetic effectsmultiparous mammals

Identifiers

PMID41729880
PMCPMC13242930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.