ArticlePloS one2026
Management of acute acquired comitant esotropia using prisms and vision therapy.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE) once considered rare, is now becoming more prevalent. Surgery in these cases can get delayed when the strabismus angle varies or if the patient is unwilling. In such cases optical management and vision therapy can be considered. We present the outcomes of such management for AACE.
methodsThis retrospective study included a cohort of patients diagnosed with non-accommodative or non-neurological AACE, managed in our institute between January to October, 2023. Prisms were prescribed to patients experiencing constant double vision. All patients were given vision therapy exercises. Eso deviation and divergence range were measured pre and post therapy.
resultsFourteen patients were included. Of these, 5 patients (with eso deviation ≤20PD) were relieved with vision therapy exercises alone. For the remaining 9 patients, prisms were prescribed along with vision therapy. Post-vision therapy, 2 patients could achieve binocular single vision without prisms, and in 4 patients the prism power was reduced. In the remaining 3, full prism correction was warranted, one of them opted for surgery. The median reduction in eso deviation by 6.5PD (range:2-25PD) and increase in divergence by 7PD (range:0-17PD) after vision therapy was significant (p < 0.03).
conclusionNon-surgical intervention reduced the eso deviation in 79% (11/14) of patients. Certain types of AACE seem to be amenable to vision therapy and/or optical management. Temporary Fresnel prisms can be considered in majority of these patients and tapered away later, if their divergence range can be improved with vision therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.