Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729869›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effects of global versus local trunk muscle strength training on muscle strength, proxies of power and rowing-specific performance in pubertal male rowers.

Raouf Hammami, Yassine Negra, Abdelkader Mahmoudi, Walid Selmi, Haithem Rebai, David G Behm, Anis Chaouachi, Urs Granacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raouf HammamiUniversity of Manouba, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, University Campus, Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-7162
Yassine NegraUniversity of Manouba, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, University Campus, Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-2490
Abdelkader MahmoudiUniversity of Manouba, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, University Campus, Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia.
Walid SelmiUniversity of Manouba, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, University Campus, Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia.
Haithem RebaiTunisian Research Laboratory 'Sports Performance Optimization' (CNMSS-LR09SEP01), National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia.
David G BehmMemorial University St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Anis ChaouachiUniversity of Manouba, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, University Campus, Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia.
Urs GranacherDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Exercise and Human Movement Science, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strength training is fundamental during long-term athlete development to enhance strength and power supporting sport-specific performance. In rowing, trunk muscles stabilize the body and transmit forces between the lower and upper limbs. This study compared the effects of pre-season global (GST) versus local (LST) trunk strength training on muscle strength, power, and rowing-specific performance in young male rowers. Twenty-eight Tier 2 athletes aged 12-13 years (circa-PHV = 0.2-0.3) completed a 6-week program with two weekly sessions. GST involved machine-based and free-weight trunk exercises at 70% 1-RM, whereas LST emphasized body-weight trunk exercises on stable and unstable surfaces. Pre- and post-tests included lower- and upper-limb power, trunk strength, and a 700-m rowing ergometer test. Significant group-by-time interactions were found for all strength (d = 3.04-3.84; p < 0.001), power (d = 0.75-2.34; p < 0.01), and rowing performance outcomes (d = 1.61; p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses indicated greater improvements in GST (d = 0.28-1.87; p < 0.001) than in LST (d = 0.11-0.73; p < 0.001). In conclusion, GST produced larger performance gains than LST. However, these effects likely reflect the combined influence of exercise modality and higher external loading intensity, rather than trunk muscle recruitment patterns alone. These findings should be interpreted with caution given that differences in external loading between conditions (70% 1-RM vs. athletes' body mass) confound the comparison of GST versus LST modalities. Strength and conditioning specialists may consider incorporating GST to enhance foundational strength and power in pubertal male rowers, but further research controlling for training load is needed to isolate the effects of exercise modality.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPubertyResistance TrainingTorsoWater SportsAdolescentAthletesChildHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41729869
PMCPMC12928413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.