ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Classification of knowledge of fertility period among adolescent girls in East Africa from 2012 to 2022: Machine learning algorithm.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the time of the menstrual cycle would help women to avoid getting pregnant without the need for surgical, hormonal, or mechanical contraception. Women who do not use contraception and do not know when they are fertile are at a higher risk (17%) of unplanned pregnancy and abortion. Classifying knowledge of fertility periods using machine learning algorithms would help to automate decision-making, produce more precise and accurate classification, and scale up to manage big and complex datasets. Therefore, this study aimed to classify knowledge of the fertility period among adolescent girls in East Africa from 2012 to 2022 using a machine-learning algorithm. A community-based cross-sectional study design was used from 12 East African countries' DHS datasets spanning 2012-2022. The machine learning algorithms were applied to classify knowledge of the fertility period and identify its predictors using R software and Python, particularly Jupiter Notebook in Anaconda. Data cleaning, one-hot encoding, data splitting, data balancing, and ten-fold cross-validation were performed. Ten machine learning algorithms and SHAP were used to select and interpret the best model. From the 40,664 adolescent girls in East Africa, 13.22% (95% CI: 12.91, 13.54) of participants had knowledge of the fertility period. Logistic regression was found to be the best model for unbalanced training data with 74.38% of an AUC and 82.71% of an accuracy. While random forest outperformed on balanced training data, it achieved 91.12% of an AUC and 83.26% accuracy. The key determinant factors of the knowledge of the fertility period were education level, country, hearing about family planning, hearing about sexually transmitted infections, wealth index, knowledge of any method, and visiting health facilities. Governments, NGOs, policy makers, and researchers can utilize these findings to design targeted interventions for improving adolescents' reproductive health based on the identified gaps and disparities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.