ArticlePloS one2026
Health risk assessment of exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in bread from Iranian markets: Application of monte carlo simulation approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent environmental contaminants formed during high-temperature processing of food and are associated with both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effects.
methodsA total of 96 bread samples (Lavash, Sangak, and Barbari) were collected from industrial and traditional bakeries across eight municipal zones of Mashhad, Iran. Sixteen priority PAHs were quantified by GC-MS after microwave-assisted saponification and DLLME clean-up. Toxic equivalent concentrations (BaPeq), daily dietary exposure, incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR), and Monte Carlo probabilistic modelling (100,000 iterations) were used for risk characterisation.
resultsMean Σ₁₆PAHs were significantly higher in traditional breads (68.63 ± 4.57 µg/kg) than industrial breads (39.87 ± 3.68 µg/kg; p < 0.001), with Lavash showing the highest levels (66.58 ± 6.02 µg/kg) and Sangak the lowest (40.95 ± 1.63 µg/kg). Naphthalene dominated light PAHs; fluoranthene and pyrene were predominant heavy PAHs. Mean BaP concentrations (0.05-0.10 µg/kg) were below the EU limit of 1 µg/kg. Mean TEQ was 0.18 µg/kg, with BaP contributing ~58%. Probabilistic assessment showed acceptable to low carcinogenic risk, slightly higher for traditional baking. Sensitivity analysis identified BaP as the primary driver. Compared globally, PAH levels in these Iranian breads indicate an acceptable risk, though continued monitoring and regulation are needed.
conclusionCurrent PAH exposure via bread in Mashhad is generally acceptable, but traditional baking markedly increases contamination. Transition to indirect-heating ovens, improved ventilation, and regular monitoring are recommended to minimise exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.