ArticlePLOS digital health2026
First-line risk stratification with machine learning models facilitates rapid triage for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains challenging, as current protocols rely on serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests that may delay decisions and overcrowd emergency departments. We retrospectively analyzed 54,636 patients receiving hs-cTn testing at emergency departments across Taiwan (May 2016-Dec 2021). Excluding STEMI and incomplete cases, we developed a machine learning (ML) model using demographics and 23 routine lab tests from the initial blood draw to enable early NSTEMI risk stratification. An actionable clinical decision supporting algorithm was also created based on ML-derived risk scores. A total of 15,096 eligible patients (mean age 69.94 ± 15.66 years; 42.2% female) were included in model training and evaluation. The ML model outperformed hs-cTn alone in both internal and external validation sets in terms of area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Beyond model development, a clinically actionable decision algorithm using risk score was established. Thresholds (<1.8 and ≥38.5) to define low- and high-risk groups, the model achieved a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.8% (98.5-99.1%) for rule-out and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.1% (73.2-82.4%) for rule-in, encompassing 48.3% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. When combined with the established 0 h/1 h algorithm, the ML model further enhanced early decision-making, safely ruling in/out 85.3% of patients within 1 hour, with PPV and NPV reaching 84.9% (79.5-87.7%) and 100% (99.6-100%), respectively. In conclusion, this ML-based approach offers not only accurate prediction but also an actionable guide to support rapid, safe NSTEMI triage in emergency care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.