Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729857›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

First-line risk stratification with machine learning models facilitates rapid triage for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Wei-Jia Luo, Yih-Mei Liou, Cheng-Han Hsiao, Chi-Sheng Hung, Heng-Yu Pan, Chien-Hua Huang, Pan-Chyr Yang, Kang-Yi Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei-Jia LuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yih-Mei LiouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Cheng-Han HsiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chi-Sheng HungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Heng-Yu PanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chien-Hua HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Pan-Chyr YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Kang-Yi SuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6538-9526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains challenging, as current protocols rely on serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests that may delay decisions and overcrowd emergency departments. We retrospectively analyzed 54,636 patients receiving hs-cTn testing at emergency departments across Taiwan (May 2016-Dec 2021). Excluding STEMI and incomplete cases, we developed a machine learning (ML) model using demographics and 23 routine lab tests from the initial blood draw to enable early NSTEMI risk stratification. An actionable clinical decision supporting algorithm was also created based on ML-derived risk scores. A total of 15,096 eligible patients (mean age 69.94 ± 15.66 years; 42.2% female) were included in model training and evaluation. The ML model outperformed hs-cTn alone in both internal and external validation sets in terms of area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Beyond model development, a clinically actionable decision algorithm using risk score was established. Thresholds (<1.8 and ≥38.5) to define low- and high-risk groups, the model achieved a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.8% (98.5-99.1%) for rule-out and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.1% (73.2-82.4%) for rule-in, encompassing 48.3% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. When combined with the established 0 h/1 h algorithm, the ML model further enhanced early decision-making, safely ruling in/out 85.3% of patients within 1 hour, with PPV and NPV reaching 84.9% (79.5-87.7%) and 100% (99.6-100%), respectively. In conclusion, this ML-based approach offers not only accurate prediction but also an actionable guide to support rapid, safe NSTEMI triage in emergency care.

Identifiers

PMID41729857
PMCPMC12928466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.