ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring unintended pregnancy journeys among women with psychiatric vulnerability using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is known that women with unintended pregnancies (UPs) experience many challenges. Women with psychiatric vulnerability may face specific concerns regarding the transmission of psychiatric vulnerability, parenting skills and bonding capacities with their offspring. This study aimed to explore how women with psychiatric vulnerability experience UPs.
methodsThis is a prospective qualitative study using semi-structured interviews during pregnancy and after delivery regarding the experiences of women with UPs and psychiatric vulnerability and involved partners. Follow-up interviews were conducted three to six months after delivery. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was employed to analyze the data.
resultsWomen with psychiatric vulnerabilities described unintended pregnancies as complex events, often marked by ambivalent pregnancy intentions, concerns about generational trauma, and fears about parental adequacy. The pregnancies triggered heightened psychiatric symptoms, resurfacing childhood memories, and concerns about stigma, yet also motivated participants to seek support from mental health professionals and trusted others. Women adopted coping strategies such as focusing on the future, seeking distraction, and accepting support to manage emotional challenges. Across pregnancy and postpartum, many participants reported developing strong prenatal and postnatal bonding with the newborn, creating safety nets, and making intentional behavioral changes to support their babies. For several women, the unintended pregnancy ultimately fostered personal growth and contributed to an improvement in mental well-being.
conclusionsThis study elucidates the experiences of unintended pregnancies in women with psychiatric vulnerability. Our findings show that for women with psychiatric vulnerability, UPs may also become a window of opportunity for treatment, personal growth and create a safety net for the baby and oneself. This work may help mental healthcare providers to support comprehensively expectant parents who decide to continue UPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.