ArticleTrends in hearing
A Web-Based Listening Test System for Cochlear Implant Research and its Validation for Remote Testing.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Web-based applications are increasingly used in clinical audiology, driven by the development of mobile, remote technology, and strong demand. Remote applications also have large potential to increase statistical power, accessibility, and diversity in research studies, but their utility and validity are still unclear. We developed and evaluated a web-based listening test system called AUDITO for cochlear implant (CI) research. By exploiting the advances in wireless streaming technology and personal mobile devices, AUDITO can be used to flexibly implement and administer a wide range of listening tests remotely or in-the-lab. The system was designed to be easy to use without programming. Technical features were implemented to ensure signal quality over wireless streaming. A pilot study with 20 experienced CI recipients was performed to evaluate the validity of remote testing across test paradigms. Comparisons of interest included the presentation of stimuli via cable versus Bluetooth streaming and testing remotely versus in-the-lab. Three listening tests were implemented to measure speech perception for sentences, digits in noise and spectro-temporal resolution. A questionnaire was administered to collect user feedback. The system worked reliably with various Bluetooth-compatible setups including desktop and laptop computers, tablets, and smartphones. Test results were consistent between listening modalities and across tested conditions, confirming the validity of web-based testing for these measures. User feedback was positive for system usability and function, while signal quality was not reported to be compromised via streaming. Web-based systems such as AUDITO can facilitate data collection, enable research collaboration and improve accessibility and inclusion in CI research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.