ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Inference About Separable Causal Effects With Longitudinal Bivariate Ordinal Responses With Missingness and Censoring.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Causal inference has gained extensive attention in various fields, including healthcare, epidemiology, and social sciences. While many methods have been developed, most research has been directed to handle data with a univariate response variable. This paper highlights the complication of handling causal inference with bivariate responses in the context of longitudinal studies, which can be further challenged by the presence of missingness and censoring. We begin by defining the overall treatment effect on bivariate responses and conceptualizing the treatment as having two components, each operating through different causal pathways. By using the decomposed treatment framework, we break down the overall treatment effect into the separable treatment effects on each response, which offers us a transparent interpretation with the sum of separable treatment effects equals twice the overall treatment effects. We establish that the separable treatment effect on each response can be identified using the observed data, provided our identification conditions. Subsequently, we employ the likelihood method to estimate the separable treatment effects and derive a hypothesis testing procedure to compare them. Finally, we conduct real data analysis and simulation studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.