Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729555›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Inference About Separable Causal Effects With Longitudinal Bivariate Ordinal Responses With Missingness and Censoring.

Pingbo Hu, Grace Y Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pingbo HuDepartment of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0654-5724
Grace Y YiDepartment of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canada Research Chairs ProgramNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal inference has gained extensive attention in various fields, including healthcare, epidemiology, and social sciences. While many methods have been developed, most research has been directed to handle data with a univariate response variable. This paper highlights the complication of handling causal inference with bivariate responses in the context of longitudinal studies, which can be further challenged by the presence of missingness and censoring. We begin by defining the overall treatment effect on bivariate responses and conceptualizing the treatment as having two components, each operating through different causal pathways. By using the decomposed treatment framework, we break down the overall treatment effect into the separable treatment effects on each response, which offers us a transparent interpretation with the sum of separable treatment effects equals twice the overall treatment effects. We establish that the separable treatment effect on each response can be identified using the observed data, provided our identification conditions. Subsequently, we employ the likelihood method to estimate the separable treatment effects and derive a hypothesis testing procedure to compare them. Finally, we conduct real data analysis and simulation studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Indexed as

CausalityComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLikelihood FunctionsLongitudinal StudiesModels, Statisticalbivariate responsescausal inferencecensoring datalongitudinal studiesmissing datatreatment effects

Identifiers

PMID41729555
PMCPMC12928182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.