Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729539›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2026

Sex Differences in Amyloid Pathology by Race, Ancestry, and Apolipoprotein E ε4 in an Admixed Autopsy Sample.

Maison Abu Raya, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Vitor Ribeiro Paes, Renata Elaine Paraizo Leite, Carlos Augusto Pasqualucci, Michel Satya Naslavsky, Roberta Diehl Rodriguez, Ricardo Nitrini, Eduardo Ferriolli, Isabel Elaine Allen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting continuous amyloid PET levels with CSF and plasma brain-derived p-tau217.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Sleep apnea in REM sleep as an amplifier of vascular contributions to Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maison Abu RayaGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
Claudia Kimie SuemotoDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor Ribeiro PaesPhysiopathology in Aging Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Elaine Paraizo LeitePhysiopathology in Aging Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto PasqualucciPhysiopathology in Aging Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Michel Satya NaslavskyDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Roberta Diehl RodriguezDepartment of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo NitriniDepartment of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo FerriolliDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabel Elaine AllenGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
Renaud La JoieGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
Lea T GrinbergGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Sex and racial or ancestral disparities in Alzheimer disease remain incompletely understood; autopsy studies that examine amyloid, tau, and genetic factors are scarce. Objective: To test whether neuritic plaque burden and cognitive outcomes differ by sex and whether sex modifies the effects of apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOEε4), informant-reported race, and African ancestry. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study using postmortem neuropathological data from the Biobank for Aging Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 2268 autopsies from a population-based, diverse clinicopathological sample were collected between April 2004 and March 2025. Exposures: Sex, informant-reported race (Black, White), African ancestry proportion, and APOEε4 carrier status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neuritic plaque burden (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease [CERAD] score), and cognitive function (Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]). Ordinal logistic regression examined association of sex with CERAD scores and 2- and 3-way interactions among sex, race, ancestry, and APOEε4; adjusting for age, education, vascular factors, and Braak stages. Linear models related pathology to CDR-SB, adding copathologies. Results: The analysis included 2268 autopsies (median [IQR] age, 74.8 [63.8-83.3] years; 1152 [51% male] and 1116 [49%] female; 802 [35%] Black and 1466 [65%] White; other race groups not included owing to small numbers); female individuals were older than male individuals and more likely to exhibit cognitive impairment (CDR global score ≥0.5). Female individuals had higher plaque burden than male individuals (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.67-2.29; P < .001), and this association remained significant in adjusted models for sociodemographic and vascular factors and APOEε4 status (adjusted OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33-2.20; P < .001). APOEε4 carriers of both sexes had an approximately 4-fold greater odds of plaques. Significant 2-way interactions were found between sex, APOEε4 status, race, and ancestry on CERAD scores. Black noncarriers (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67) and noncarriers of African ancestry (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.76) were least likely to have high plaque burden, whereas this protection was weakened in ε4 carriers. No significant 3-way interaction was detected. Among individuals with a CERAD score of 2 or higher, female individuals were more likely than male individuals to reach Braak stage V-VI than male individuals (probability ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.38; P = .002). Adding Braak stage to multivariable models attenuated the female-male difference in plaques and interaction of sex and plaque on CDR-SB was no longer significant. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings indicate that female sex, APOEε4, and both race and African ancestry were jointly associated with amyloid in this study population. Excess amyloid among women may partly explain their greater tau burden and steeper cognitive decline. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating sex, race, and ancestry into biomarker thresholds, risk stratification, and the design of preventive or disease-modifying trials for Alzheimer disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseApolipoprotein E4Plaque, AmyloidSex CharacteristicsAfrican PeopleAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyBlack PeopleBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhite PeopleApolipoprotein E4

Identifiers

PMID41729539
PMCPMC12931469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.