Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729480›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Stereotactic two-needle irreversible electroporation of liver tumors near critical structures: a proof-of-concept study.

Liang Zhang, Vinzenz Mayr, Lukas Luerken, Quirin Strotzer, Moritz Brandenstein, Laura Kupke, Anthony Ngu, Christian Stroszczynski, Ingo Einspieler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Liang.Zhang@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4952-8718
Vinzenz MayrDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lukas LuerkenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Quirin StrotzerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Moritz BrandensteinDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Laura KupkeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anthony NguDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian StroszczynskiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ingo EinspielerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal ablation technique suitable for tumors near critical structures, but its widespread use is limited by technical complexity and the need for multiple electrodes. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a stereotactic percutaneous two-needle IRE approach for small liver tumors in anatomically challenging locations. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 17 consecutive patients with 18 primary or secondary liver tumors (≤ 2.0 cm) adjacent to critical anatomical structures underwent CT-navigated stereotactic two-needle IRE between December 2021 and May 2025. Ablation was performed with a high-dose protocol (2 × 90 pulses, 90 µs, > 20 A). Primary endpoints were primary technique efficacy (PTE) and local tumor progression (LTP); secondary endpoints included complications. Needle placement was assessed through geometric analysis.

resultsPTE was obtained in 17/18 tumors (94.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 72.7-99.9%). At a median follow-up of 12.4 months, LTP occurred in 1/18 tumors (5.6%, 95% CI: 0.1-27.3%). No complications or procedure-related mortality were observed. Geometric analysis showed high accuracy of stereotactic needle placement, while treatment failure was associated with suboptimal geometry.

conclusionStereotactic percutaneous two-needle IRE seems to be technically feasible with a favorable safety profile for small liver tumors in anatomically challenging locations and may offer a simplified alternative to multielectrode approaches. However, given the small, retrospective single-center design, these findings are preliminary and require prospective multicenter validation to establish oncologic effectiveness and generalizability. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Stereotactic two-needle irreversible electroporation offered a simplified, safe, and effective alternative to multielectrode ablation, potentially broadening treatment options for liver tumors near critical structures and improving accessibility, reproducibility, and outcomes in interventional oncology. KEY POINTS: First systematic clinical evaluation of stereotactic two-needle irreversible electroporation (IRE) for liver tumors. Two-needle configuration with high-dose protocol simplifies IRE compared with standard multielectrode approaches. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates high efficacy and absence of complications in small liver tumors near critical structures. Two-needle IRE may broaden clinical applicability in anatomically challenging locations.

Indexed as

ElectroporationIrreversible Electroporation TherapyLiver NeoplasmsStereotaxic TechniquesAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesProof of Concept StudyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAblation techniquesCarcinoma (hepatocellular)Colorectal neoplasmsElectroporationIrreversible electroporation

Identifiers

PMID41729480
PMCPMC12929738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.