ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026
Acquisition, image quality, and PI-RADS agreement of ultrahigh-gradient DWI in prostate 3-T MRI.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Present status of prostate cancer diagnosis, limitations, challenges, and future endeavors.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Dual-conditioned diffusion model with anatomical guidance for geometric distortion correction in prostate MRI.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Advances in new ultrasound technologies in targeted prostate biopsy (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNew magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gradient technology enables the acquisition of ultrahigh b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). We assessed its impact on image quality and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores in prostate MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsParticipants with cancer suspicion prospectively underwent 3-T prostate MRI (maximum gradient strength 200 mT/m). Sequences with b-values of 0/800, 1,500, 2,500, 3,500, and 4,500 s/mm² were acquired. Lesion conspicuity was rated from 1 (non-diagnostic) to 5 (excellent). Apparent signal-to-noise ratios (aSNR) and acquisition times were determined. Cumulative link mixed-effects models, repeated measures ANOVA, and Cohen/Fleiss κ statistics were used.
resultsA total of 107 participants, aged 67 ± 8 years (mean ± standard deviation), were included. Compared to DWI(b1500), the DWI(b2500), DWI(b3500), and DWI(b4500) acquisitions were worse regarding both lesion conspicuity (median score, 5 [interquartile interval 4-5] versus 4 [3-4] versus 2 [2-3] versus 2 [1-2], respectively; all p < 0.001) and aSNR (19.0 ± 7.5 versus 12.7 ± 4.8 versus 11.8 ± 4.1 versus 11.4 ± 2.6, respectively; all p < 0.001). Acquisition times increased from DWI(b1500) (107 ± 9 s) to DWI(b4500) (329 ± 26 s). Cohen κ for PI-RADS score agreement was good to moderate (DWI(b2500): 0.87 [confidence interval 0.81, 0.94]; DWI(b3500): 0.75 [0.65, 0.84]; DWI(4500): 0.61 [0.49, 0.72]).
conclusionAcquired ultrahigh gradient DWI sequences with ultrahigh b-values in prostate MRI had worse image quality than standard b-values, while PI-RADS agreement between DWI(b1500) and DWI(b2500) was good. However, diagnostic estimates for clinically significant prostate carcinoma remained limited due to a small biopsy sample size (50/107 patients). RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ultrahigh b-value DWI showed no improved diagnostic performance in comparison to standard b-value DWI regarding the identification of potential prostate cancer. Ultrahigh b-value should not replace standard high b-values (1,500 s/mm²) for imaging workup of patients with suspicion for prostate cancer. KEY POINTS: Acquired ultrahigh b-values (b2500-4500) using ultrahigh gradients of up to 140 T/m were utilized for prostate DWI. Both, overall image quality and diagnostic confidence decreased from good for DWI(b1500) to non-diagnostic for DWI(b4500). PI-RADS agreement between DWI(b1500) and DWI(b2500) was good, while it was only moderate between DWI(b1500) and DWI(b4500).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.