ReviewDrugs2026
Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: Therapeutic Update.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [New treatment options for autoimmune bullous diseases].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Management of Bullous Pemphigoid and Norwegian Scabies with Dupilumab Plus Ivermectin.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Rituximab in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bullous Pemphigoid: A Focused Review on Antigen Epitopes.Experimental dermatology · 2026Review
- Abrocitinib and dupilumab bridging therapy for bullous pemphigoid with insufficient response to initial corticosteroid therapy: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Thematic Evolution and Diversification of Bullous Pemphigoid Research: A Bibliometric Analysis, 1959-2025.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Targeting type 2 inflammation in dermatology: mechanisms and clinical implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Dupilumab enables glucocorticoid withdrawal in refractory multisite mucous membrane pemphigoid: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) are a heterogeneous group of at least a dozen disorders characterized by autoantibodies against structural proteins of desmosomes in the skin and surface-close epithelia in pemphigus and of the dermal-epidermal junction in pemphigoid diseases. Novel disease entities have recently been described. Owing to their relative rarity with annual incidences between below 1 and about 20 new cases per million inhabitants, few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed. In this review, we summarize the results of recent RCTs and future treatment options for the three most frequent AIBDs, i.e., bullous pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris/foliaceus, and mucous membrane pemphigoid. More specifically, RCTs with immunoadsorption, rilzabrutinib, and efgartigimod in pemphigus, as well as dupilumab, benralizumab, mepolizumab, avdoralimab, and efgartigimod in bullous pemphigoid are summarized. The recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 inhibitor dupilumab for moderate/severe bullous pemphigoid is highlighted. In addition, an overview is given about the current treatment landscape on the basis of national and international guidelines as well the experience of the authors. In all, while licensing of rituximab for pemphigus vulgaris and dupilumab for bullous pemphigoid represents a therapeutic breakthrough, the lack of industry-sponsored RCTs in mucous membrane pemphigoid and the failure of recent RCTs in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid demonstrate, on the one hand, the high medical need for effective and safe therapies in AIBDs and, on the other hand, the apparent difficulty in finding suitable compounds and appropriate trial designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.