ArticleOral radiology2026
Evaluation of bone healing using fractal analysis in immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis treated with three different techniques.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fractal analysis in dentistry: a bibliometric analysis (1991-2024).Oral radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the time-dependent alterations in fractal dimension (FD) of the periapical bone in IPTs treated with calcium hydroxide (CH) apexification, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apexification, or regenerative endodontic treatment (RET).
methodsA total of 70 teeth were divided into three groups (CH group: n = 25, MTA group: n = 22, RET group: n = 23) and retrospectively evaluated. In each case, the FD value of the periapical bone was calculated using fractal analysis (FA) on pre-treatment and 1-year post-treatment periapical radiographic images.
resultsIn all the groups, the FD values were significantly greater at the 1-year follow-up than at baseline (p˂0.001). The FD increase in the MTA group was significantly greater than that in the CH group (p < 0.05). The FD increase in the RET group was similar to that in the MTA group; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between the RET group and the other two groups. (p > 0.05).
conclusionIt is observed that higher success is achieved in the treatment of IPTs with MTA apexification and RET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41729352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.