SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Liquid Biopsy as Post-Treatment Prognostic Biomarkers in Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence in early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Despite growing interest, the prognostic impact of ctDNA detection in this setting remains to be fully elucidated.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on prospective studies assessing the association between ctDNA positivity and outcomes in early or locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer. Databases including PubMed and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Studies were included if they reported hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival (DFS) and/or overall survival (OS) according to ctDNA status. Pooled HRs were calculated using random-effects models; heterogeneity was evaluated with the I
resultsEighteen studies comprising 1670 patients were included. ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with shorter DFS (pooled HR 6.92, 95% CI 3.64-13.13; p < 0.0001; I
conclusionsctDNA positivity is a robust prognostic biomarker for recurrence in early breast cancer. Its integration into post-treatment surveillance and interventional trials may enable risk-adapted strategies and early therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41729350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.