ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Distinct cMET inhibitors uncover pharmacological heterogeneity in SHH medulloblastoma cell lines.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The c-MET kinase signalling pathway is crucial in cerebellum development and has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for medulloblastoma treatment. Our study confirms that c-MET and its ligand HGF are highly expressed in the SHH medulloblastoma subgroup, with SHH-α and SHH-β subtypes showing the highest expression levels of both genes, respectively. HGF treatments and siRNA-mediated c-MET knockdown demonstrated the proliferative dependence of SHH MB cells on c-MET signalling. However, time-lapse microscopy revealed heterogeneous behaviours of SHH cell lines following alterations in c-MET levels. Pharmacological inhibition of c-MET signalling showed that tivantinib outperforms other c-MET inhibitors, including crizotinib and foretinib, in killing SHH medulloblastoma cells. Tivantinib induces a prolonged mitotic block followed by apoptotic death in both 2D and 3D cell culture models. Additionally, tivantinib enhances the anti-proliferative activity of vincristine, the standard of care for MB patients, specifically in DAOY cells, where the combination of vincristine and tivantinib synergistically increases the level of PARP cleavage. Moreover, we demonstrated that foretinib and crizotinib induce mitotic slippage in SHH MB cells. The use of navitoclax, a pan-BCL2 inhibitor, initiates the apoptotic program after cells fail mitosis. Taken together, these data suggest that tivantinib is a superior clinical option for SHH MB patients, whereas foretinib or crizotinib should be considered only in combination with BCL2 inhibitors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.