ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Deep learning-based automated positioning system for maxillary skeletal expander: development and clinical validation.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system capable of automatically generating accurate MSE placement plans to enhance clinical efficiency, safety, and consistency.
methodsA total of 120 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and transverse maxillary deficiency (ages 10–39) were included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scan data were used to construct individualized three-dimensional anatomical coordinate systems. A deep learning model was trained to automatically segment key anatomical structures (e.g., the incisive foramen and transverse palatine suture) and identify essential craniofacial landmarks. The MSE was then automatically positioned within this coordinate system, while a collision detection algorithm ensured appropriate spacing from the palatal mucosa and avoided vital anatomical structures. Model performance was compared with manual placement using metrics such as mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), Avoidance Success Rate (ASR), Mean Radial Error (MRE), Mean Angular Error (MAE), and Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC).
resultsThe average mIoU of the segmentation network was 0.75. The ASR exceeded 90%, demonstrating effective anatomical avoidance. The automated system achieved an axial MRE of 0.32 ± 0.32 mm, a three-dimensional (3D) Euclidean distance error of 0.69 ± 0.36 mm, and an MAE of 1.84 ± 2.13°, with CCC values above 0.90 for linear and translational directions and between 0.87 and 0.93 for angular directions. These results showed no statistically significant differences from manual placement (P > 0.05).Bland–Altman analysis further showed minimal mean bias between AI and manual planning (translation bias ≤ 0.047 mm; rotation bias within − 0.26° to 1.52°), with 95% limits of agreement for all parameters remaining within clinically acceptable ranges; a mild proportional bias was observed only for yaw (P = 0.013).The automated process required an average of 3 min, significantly faster than the 45–60 minutes typically required for manual planning.
conclusionThe proposed deep learning–based automated MSE positioning system enables accurate and efficient MSE digital planning in a retrospective setting, shows promising clinical potential, and may contribute to more standardized and intelligent orthodontic expansion workflows. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This deep learning–driven tool may facilitate standardized MSE placement, shorten treatment planning time, and support clinicians with limited experience, thereby enhancing the safety and efficiency of maxillary skeletal expansion in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.