ReviewNeurosurgical review2026
Circulating cell-free DNA and circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic spine disease, is there a role?
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic spine disease (MSD) impacts patient survival, yet existing prognostic scoring models lack robustness in predicting survival. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have emerged as promising non-invasive tumor-derived biomarkers reflecting disease burden and prognosis. However, its role in MSD remains underexplored. We aimed to review the utility of cfDNA and ctDNA in predicting treatment response, disease progression and survival in cancers commonly metastasizing to the spine, focusing on its potential application in MSD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across five databases. Studies investigating six cancers were included. Sixteen studies evaluating 3,332 patients were included. Elevated baseline cfDNA and ctDNA levels correlated with higher tumor burden, shorter progression-free survival and overall-survival. Higher baseline cfDNA and ctDNA levels trended toward greater treatment resistance. Persistent cfDNA or ctDNA during or after treatment was linked to poorer response and higher recurrence risk. No studies evaluated cfDNA or ctDNA in MSD. cfDNA-derived chromosomal instability scores could stratify MSD patients by survival risk. No identified studies evaluated cfDNA or ctDNA in radiologically confirmed MSD. However, existing evidence suggests that cfDNA and ctDNA may hold promise as real-time biomarkers for MSD prognostication. Future research should evaluate whether cfDNA and ctDNA have prognostic value in MSD and whether they could eventually be integrated into existing MSD scoring systems to improve risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41729329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.