Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729280›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2026

[Psychiatric and psychotherapeutic recommendations for long/post-COVID and ME/CFS: a narrative review of international guidelines].

Gizem Kaya, Franziska Kroehn-Liedtke, Olivia Kalinowski, James Kenneth Moran, Richard Neal, Adak Pirmorady-Sehouli, Lorena Dini, Meryam Schouler-Ocak

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2026
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gizem KayaPsychiatrischen Universitätsklinik der Charité, im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Große Hamburger Straße 5-11, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland. gizem.kaya@charite.de.
Franziska Kroehn-LiedtkePsychiatrischen Universitätsklinik der Charité, im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Große Hamburger Straße 5-11, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.
Olivia KalinowskiPsychiatrischen Universitätsklinik der Charité, im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Große Hamburger Straße 5-11, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.
James Kenneth MoranPsychiatrischen Universitätsklinik der Charité, im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Große Hamburger Straße 5-11, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.
Richard NealMed. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Adak Pirmorady-SehouliMed. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Lorena DiniMed. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Allgemeinmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Meryam Schouler-OcakPsychiatrischen Universitätsklinik der Charité, im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Große Hamburger Straße 5-11, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong/post-COVID and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are often accompanied by fatigue, cognitive impairments and psychological symptoms. Psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care is challenged by unclear evidence, symptomatic overlaps, and controversial treatment recommendations.

objectivePresentation and comparison of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic recommendations in relevant international and national guidelines on long/post-COVID and ME/CFS, focusing on psychotherapy and psychopharmacotherapy.

methodsA narrative review was conducted. National and international guidelines focusing on ME/CFS and long/post-COVID published between 2020 and 2025, particularly by the WHO, AWMF, NICE, CDC and IQWiG, were included. The selected guidelines were analyzed in terms of key aspects.

resultsPsychiatric pharmacotherapy is recommended only for comorbid disorders. Psychotherapeutic interventions are mostly recommended as supportive in the guidelines. Activating treatment approaches, such as graded exercise therapy (GET) are generally viewed critically in connection with postexertional malaise (PEM), whereas for patients without PEM, several guidelines explicitly endorse moderate, individually adapted activation. Pacing strategies are highlighted across guidelines as a central concept of activity management. DISCUSSION: Psychiatric and psychotherapeutic interventions in long/post-COVID and ME/CFS are supportive but not causal treatments. Guidelines recommend symptom-oriented, individualized therapeutic approaches as well as an integrative consideration of somatic, social and psychological factors in the sense of the biopsychosocial model. There is a high need for specific research on psychotherapeutic intervention forms in these patient groups.

Indexed as

Behavioral therapyFatiguePacingPsychotherapeutic interventionsResource-oriented approach

Identifiers

PMID41729280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.