Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06604442 (Intrapatient Comparison of Urinary Radioactivity Following Piflufolastat), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intrapatient Comparison of Urinary Radioactivity Following Piflufolastat (18F) and Flotufolastat (18F) PET in Men With Low PSA Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis prospective, multicentre, intra-patient comparator study assessed urinary radioactivity, and patient-level and region-level detection rates (DR) with PSMA-PET radiopharmaceuticals, 18F-piflufolastat (18F-DCFPyL) and 18F-flotufolastat (18F-rhPSMA-7.3) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer to evaluate the hypothesis that lower urinary radioactivity is observed with 18F-flotufolastat.
methodsPatients with low PSA (≤0.5 ng/mL) BCR ≥6 months post-prostatectomy with undetectable PSA post-surgery, scheduled for standard-of-care 18F-piflufolastat PSMA-PET were enrolled. Patients underwent PET/CT 60 minutes post-18F-piflufolastat (9 mCi) administration, and a second PET/CT on the same scanner 1–10 days later, 60 minutes post-18F-flotufolastat (8 mCi) administration. The primary endpoint was the difference in urinary radioactivity (SUVmean) between the radiopharmaceuticals. Secondary endpoints included patient-level and region-level DR for each radiopharmaceutical, assessed by two blinded readers (a third resolved disagreements, allowing majority reads).
resultsFifty-five evaluable patients (mean PSA, 0.28 ng/mL) were enrolled. Median bladder SUVmean was significantly higher with 18F-piflufolastat (29.0; interquartile range, 18.9–40.8) than 18F-flotufolastat (10.9; interquartile range, 6.0–18.5; p < 0.001 [Wilcoxon signed-rank test]). Majority read patient-level DR were 27.3% (15/55) for 18F-piflufolastat and 45.5% (25/55) for 18F-flotufolastat. Region-level DR for 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat, were 10.9% (6/55) and 18.2% (10/55) in the prostate bed, 14.5% (8/55) and 16.4% (9/55) in pelvic lymph nodes, and 7.3% (4/55) and 21.8% (12/55) in extra-pelvic sites. Among patients with PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL, 38.1% (8/21) and 52.4% (11/21) had positive 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat scans, respectively.
conclusionsThis intra-patient comparator shows 18F-flotufolastat has significantly lower urinary radioactivity than 18F-piflufolastat, which may help to optimise image assessment in regions close to the urinary tract. CLINICAL
trial registrationTrial registration, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06604442. Registered September 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.