ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Visual-spatial working memory in ADHD: new evidence for a storage rather than a processing deficit.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to voluntarily control eye movements is part of the "executive function" domain, which includes working memory and is impaired in neuro-developmental disorders such as ADHD. The present study aimed to investigate two types of "executive" saccades - anti-saccades (AS) and memory-guided saccades (MGS) - as well as their relationships in samples of children and adolescents with ADHD and neurotypical controls. To that end, anti-saccades and memory-guided saccades were recorded in n = 65 participants with ADHD (age 9.2-17.1 years) and n = 74 neurotypical controls (aged 9.1-17.3 years) as part of a larger ocular-motor test battery, using the EyeLink 1000 + eye tracker (SR-Research). Results reveal less correct MGS with lower spatial accuracy as well as a trend for less correct AS with normal spatial accuracy in participants with ADHD, compared to neurotypical controls. Furthermore, the spatial accuracies of AS and MGS were significantly correlated in the control (r=.35) and ADHD (r=.26) groups, corresponding to medium effect sizes (eta2: control: 0.12, ADHD: 0.07). These findings suggest that the storage of spatial information in working memory, as required in the MGS task, is impaired in ADHD, while the processing of this information, as required in the AS task, remains largely intact. The correlations between the two task parameters in both groups confirm that storage and processing are related abilities in working memory and that this relationship is basically intact in ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.