ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Prenatal Counseling Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease in Brazilian Portuguese.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly and a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. A prenatal diagnosis of CHD is a psychologically distressing event that requires sensitive and effective counseling. However, no validated tool exists in Brazilian Portuguese to assess the quality of counseling provided to families following such diagnosis. To conduct the cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of "Kovacevic Questionnaire" for evaluating parental counseling after prenatal CHD diagnosis into Brazilian Portuguese. This cross-sectional study followed the standardized guidelines for cultural adaptation proposed by Beaton et al. The process included translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, and psychometric evaluation. Two Expert Committees assessed semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual equivalence. Content Validity Index (CVI), Prevalence- and Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK), and Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) were calculated. The adapted instrument was pre-tested with ten pregnant women carrying fetuses diagnosed with CHD. The adaptation process resulted in a culturally relevant and linguistically accurate Brazilian version. Expert agreement was high, with most items achieving CVI and PABAK values close to 1.0 and CVC values ≥ 0.80. Minor linguistic refinements were made for clarity and cultural sensitivity. Pre-test participants rated all items as clear and relevant, with CVI and PABAK equal to 1.00. The Brazilian Portuguese version of "Kovacevic Questionnaire" demonstrated high validity and acceptability. It provides clinicians and researchers with a reliable tool to assess and enhance counseling quality for families facing prenatal CHD diagnoses, particularly in diverse and resource-constrained settings such as the Amazon region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41729270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.