ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Artificial intelligence in paediatric neuroradiology: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prompting the future: artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Pediatric radiology informatics within a larger academic practice.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review maps the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) in paediatric and fetal neuroradiology, critically evaluating current practice, barriers to clinical adoption, and future potential. We searched for peer-reviewed studies from the last decade, focusing on image segmentation, lesion detection, classification, prognostication, and clinical decision support in paediatric brain imaging. Particular consideration was given to unique paediatric factors such as brain development and data scarcity. AI techniques, notably deep learning, have demonstrated success in automated brain tumour segmentation, detection of epileptogenic lesions, and radiomics-based classifiers predicting tumour histology and molecular subtypes. Despite these advancements, clinical adoption remains limited. Key barriers identified include high implementation costs, limited large-scale diverse paediatric datasets, and concerns regarding safety, bias, and regulatory approval. Addressing these issues through data-sharing initiatives, federated learning, paediatric-specific validation, and revised ethical and regulatory frameworks is crucial. Ongoing multi-institutional collaborations can facilitate AI's integration into paediatric neuroradiology, complementing radiologists and improving paediatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.