ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Assisted dying from an international perspective and the debate in Germany].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Suicides in agriculture: a cross-population analysis based on Bavarian police crime statistics].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article provides an overview of the legal, political, and social framework conditions and developments relating to euthanasia in selected countries. It has been demonstrated that the practice of euthanasia was initially subject to certain narrowly defined conditions (e.g., incurable or terminal illnesses) in many countries and was expanded within a relatively short period of time, both in terms of legal access requirements and practical application. In countries such as the Netherlands and Canada, active euthanasia was also permitted from the outset and accounts for the vast majority of documented cases there.In contrast to the international developments described above, Germany is still in the process of legal and social reorientation following the 2020 ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court. Despite the ruling's establishment of the fundamental admissibility of assisted suicide, a paucity of procedural and institutional regulations exists to facilitate uniform practice.At this time, a comparison of developments in Germany with those in other countries is not possible, due to the absence of separate statistics on assisted suicide cases. The Federal Statistical Office continues to record and report both "regular" and assisted suicides in the same category of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). The figures published by euthanasia organizations have not been officially verified, but they do indicate a significant increase in documented cases since 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.