ArticleActa ophthalmologica2026
Identification and functional validation of a novel disease-causing variant in the noncoding region of NYX.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and functional validation of a novel disease-causing variant in the noncoding region of NYX.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders, with ~30% of cases remaining genetically unsolved. Complete congenital stationary night blindness (cCSNB) is a subtype of IRD, usually associated with reduced visual acuity, nystagmus and high myopia. Most cases are caused by variants in NYX, TRPM1, GRM6, GPR179 or LRIT3. This study aimed to identify the genetic defect in a subject with clinically diagnosed cCSNB lacking coding variants in known associated genes.
methodsA male patient presented with an electroretinogram profile consistent with cCSNB in the absence of high myopia. Pathogenic variants were not detected using Sanger sequencing of the coding regions of all known CSNB-associated genes. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatic analysis using SpliceAI, Pangolin, REVEL, CADD v1.7, BayesDel and MetaRNN were performed to detect potential pathogenic variants. Functional impact of this variant has been analysed using LINSIGHT, ReMM and FunUV. A minigene assay was used to assess the splicing impact of the identified variant.
resultsWGS identified a novel c.-57G>A variant in the 5' untranslated region, within exon 1 of NYX coding for nyctalopin. In silico predictions suggested this variant to alter splicing, which was confirmed by a minigene assay showing abnormal expression of NYX. The defect was predicted to reduce nyctalopin production, potentially explaining the milder cCSNB phenotype.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report describing a noncoding variant in NYX causing CSNB but lacking high myopia. These results highlight the clinical importance of screening noncoding regions of known IRD genes in genetically unsolved cases. Whether the development of high myopia in cCSNB depends on the type and location of NYX variants remains to be elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.