Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41729042›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Light Filtering Lenses and Visual Photosensitivity in Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Mariela C Aguilar, Heather Durkee, Alex Gonzalez, James Lai, Brandon Chou, David Valdes Arias, Shivam P Patel, Felipe Echeverri Tribin, Shreya Bhatt, Cornelis Rowaan and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mariela C AguilarOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Heather DurkeeOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Alex GonzalezOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
James LaiOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Brandon ChouOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
David Valdes AriasOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Shivam P PatelOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Felipe Echeverri TribinOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Shreya BhattOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Cornelis RowaanOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Gemayaret AlvarezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Barry E HurwitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States.
Byron L LamAnne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Elizabeth R FelixDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Jean-Marie A ParelOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Anat GalorAnne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Dmitry V Ivanov · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
Differentiation of Clinical Phenotypes of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Ocular Pain Conditions with Morphologic Measures and Functional Brain ImagingU01EY034686 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Eric Alan Moulton · 2022 to 2026
$4.7M
Tear protein biomarkers of refractive surgery painR61EY032468 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI AICHER, SUE A, GALOR, ANAT · 2020 to 2022
$2.0M
Dry Eye and MicroenvironmentR01EY026174 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GALOR, ANAT, KUMAR, NARESH · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
BLRD VA I01 BX004893CSRD VA I01 CX002015NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026174NEI NIH HHS R61 EY032468NEI NIH HHS U01 EY034686RRD VA I21 RX003883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess visual photosensitivity using the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer (OPA) with and without light filtering lenses in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and non-TBI controls. Methods: This cohort study included 46 individuals with TBI (n = 46) and without TBI (n = 46) assessed from May 2021 to August 2023 at a large academic tertiary center. Visual photosensitivity thresholds (VPTs) were measured at two visits (≥1 month apart) under four lens conditions: no lens (NL), plano lenses (PLs), FL-41 lenses (FLs), and gray-filtering lenses (GLs). Lower VPTs indicate greater visual photosensitivity. Results: Participants with TBI had significantly lower VPTs compared with non-TBI controls across all lens conditions at the initial visit (TBI: PL = 1.6 ± 0.9, FL = 1.9 ± 0.9, and GL = 1.9 ± 1.0; and non-TBI: PL = 2.5 ± 0.9, FL = 2.8 ± 0.9, and GL = 2.8 ± 0.9 log lux, P < 0.05). Both groups showed improved (higher) VPTs with FLs and GLs compared with NL and PL conditions. Results were repeatable at the second visit (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = >0.80 for all conditions). Conclusions: Individuals with TBI consistently demonstrated greater visual photosensitivity compared with controls. FL and GL light filtering lenses improved light tolerance for both groups. These results highlight visual photosensitivity as a TBI sequela and suggest that these light filtering lenses may serve as effective treatment options.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEye Protective DevicesPhotosensitivity DisordersAdultFemaleHumansLightMaleMiddle AgedVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41729042
PMCPMC12934528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.