ArticleSICOT-J2026
Midcarpal tenodeses versus partial arthrodeses for stage II SLAC/SNAC wrists: Long-term outcomes from a single-surgeon comparative series.
Article in SICOT-J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of modified Henry approach with preservation of Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendon Sheath on wrist function in the treatment of distal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStage II scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) are commonly treated with partial arthrodeses or motion-preserving techniques such as midcarpal tenodeses. Comparative evidence with long-term follow-up remains limited. PURPOSE: To compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes of midcarpal tenodeses and partial arthrodeses in patients with stage II SLAC/SNAC, by evaluating grip strength, range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, and reoperation rates.
methodsA retrospective review was performed on 21 patients operated by a single surgeon with a mean follow-up of 103 months. Nine underwent midcarpal tenodeses (FCR or ECRB based), and twelve underwent partial arthrodeses (four-corner fusion or capitolunate fusion). Outcomes included grip strength, range of motion, radiographs, and PROMs (VAS, DASH, PRWE, Mayo Wrist Score).
resultsBoth procedures produced comparable long-term outcomes. Mean postoperative grip strength was 27.9 kg (~75% of the contralateral side). PROMs were similar between groups (DASH 12.1, PRWE 15.5). Importantly, no complications, non-unions, or conversions to salvage arthrodesis occurred in either group during long-term follow-up.
conclusionMidcarpal tenodeses and partial arthrodeses yield similarly durable outcomes in stage II SLAC/SNAC wrists. Tenodeses preserve motion and are suitable for patients with preserved cartilage, whereas partial arthrodeses offer predictable stability when midcarpal degeneration is present. Treatment should be individualized according to cartilage status, functional demands, and patient expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.