Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728876›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2026

The current state of acute care surgery workforce and practice models: A joint statement by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, and the Western Trauma Association.

Kristan L Staudenmayer, Galinos Barmparas, Stephen L Barnes, Walter L Biffl, Mitchell J Cohen, Kimberly A Davis, Marc de Moya, Amy J Goldberg, Bellal Joseph, R Shayn Martin and 8 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kristan L StaudenmayerStanford Department of Surgery (K.L.S.); Department of Surgery (G.B.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; University of Missouri Department of Surgery (S.L.B.); Scripps Clinic/Scripps Clinic Medical Group (W.L.B.); University of Colorado (M.J.C.); Yale School of Medicine Department of Surgery (K.A.D.); Medical College of Wisconsin (M.d.M.); Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University (A.J.G.); The University of Arizona College of Medicine (B.J.), Tucson; Wake Forest School of Medicine (R.S.M.); Department of Surgery (P.B.M.), Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Gurthrie (A.G.R.); University of Rochester Medical Center (M.R.); University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (S.A.S.); Hiram C. Polk Jr. Department of Surgery (J.W.S.), University of Louisville; Grady Health System (S.R.T.); Division of Acute Care and Regional General Surgery, Department of Surgery (B.L.Z.), University of Wisconsin-Madison; and University of Washington (E.B.).ORCID 0000-0001-5336-376
Galinos Barmparas
Stephen L Barnes
Walter L Biffl
Mitchell J Cohen
Kimberly A Davis
Marc de Moya
Amy J Goldberg
Bellal Joseph
R Shayn Martin
Patrick B Murphy
Anne G Rizzo
Michael Rotondo
Stephanie A Savage
Jason W Smith
S Rob Todd
Ben L Zarzaur
Eileen Bulger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAcute care surgery (ACS) is a specialty that includes trauma, emergency general surgery, and surgical critical care. It has become a vital surgical specialty in the United States, providing surgical services, rescue functions, disaster response, and other important services. Despite its key role in patient care and hospital operations, ACS faces challenges to its sustainability. This overview targets readers who wish to understand the structure and scope of ACS and who work with or manage these practices. The goal is to provide an overview of ACS, its current challenges, and suggestions for developing the specialty. This consensus statement was created by the Acute Care Surgery Workforce Workgroup, which includes representatives from various national surgical organizations. The article combines current ACS models, staffing and compensation practices, and institutional value. It relies on expert agreements and national trends. Several key themes are examined. The value of ACS is shown through better patient outcomes, efficiency, cost savings, and support for institutional missions like disaster preparedness and education. Current ACS programs differ significantly in structure, but two main staffing models exist: traditional (historic) and time delineated. Each model has its own advantages and challenges regarding workload, sustainability, and academic involvement. Regardless of the staffing model, most physician compensation often depends on the measurement of work relative value units. However, these do not fully capture the extent and intensity of ACS work. Additional challenges for the specialty include inconsistencies in terminologies, the absence of board certification, and varying compensation standards. Acute care surgery is a crucial specialty that provides significant value to patients, hospitals, and health care systems. To maintain sustainability and quality, health care leaders need to consider the complexities of ACS practice discussed in this article as well as local demands. Staffing and compensation models should be sustainable and optimize for patient care. Recognizing both clinical and nonclinical contributions of ACS surgeons is essential for resilience and further development of the specialty.

Indexed as

Health WorkforceTraumatologyAcute Care SurgeryHumansModels, OrganizationalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesWorkforceAcute care surgerycompensationhospital operationsstaffing modelsworkforce

Identifiers

PMID41728876
PMCPMC12928815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.