Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728648›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

A Deleuzian Examination of Anorexia & Recovery: Opening up Possibilities for Conceptualizing Care.

Sydney Gaudet, Holly Symonds-Brown, Jude Spiers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sydney GaudetFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Holly Symonds-BrownFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1067-2890
Jude SpiersFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorexia, a type of eating disorder, holds the highest mortality rate of all mental illnesses. Contemporary etiological consensus reflected in eating disorder literature views anorexia as the result of an interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors. However, the current organization of inpatient care fails to reflect such complexity and remains bound by biomedical knowledge regimes. Within these regimes, recovery is defined within a curative, disease-oriented framework, one that yields recovery rates of less than fifty percent. The following article serves as a meta-cognitive exercise, drawing on the work of French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. In particular, we use their ontology of immanence as a heuristic device to examine and challenge the hierarchical prioritization of biomedical ontological systems in how inpatient care and recovery for anorexia are conceptualized. As a result, we explore what an immanent conceptualization of inpatient care and recovery for anorexia might do to the organization of care and, by extension, the role of the nurse in eating disorder care.

Indexed as

AnorexiaConcept FormationHumansanorexiacareDeleuzeGuattarinursingontologyrecovery

Identifiers

PMID41728648
PMCPMC12927134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.