ArticleCureus2026
The Effectiveness of a Preoperative Check-and-Consent Clinic in Reducing Day-of-Surgery Cancellations in Elective Hand Surgery: A Retrospective Service Evaluation.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Day-of-surgery cancellations (DoSC) waste resources, increase costs, and cause patient dissatisfaction. They are common and often preventable. With growing reliance on allied healthcare professionals and virtual clinics, patients can be listed without surgeon review or a Montgomery-compliant consent process, leading to last-minute changes. A surgeon-led "check-and-consent" clinic was introduced to reduce potential DoSC in elective hand surgery. A retrospective review was conducted of patients scheduled for elective day-case hand surgery and seen in the check-and-consent clinic (April 2022-January 2024). A consultant surgeon reassessed symptoms, reconfirmed consent, adjusted management as required, and obtained written consent. Primary outcomes were management changes and potential DoSCs avoided. Secondary outcomes included cost impact using National Health Service (NHS) tariffs. Sixty-seven patients were scheduled; one did not attend, leaving 66 analyzed (mean age, 58.1 years). Carpal tunnel syndrome was the most common diagnosis (77.3%). Management changed in 29 patients (43.9%): 12 were converted to nonoperative care, eight declined or did not require treatment, and nine had a modified surgical plan. A minimum of 20 DoSCs (30.3%) were avoided. Cost analysis demonstrated net financial savings after accounting for clinic costs. A dedicated check-and-consent clinic reduced avoidable DoSCs, improved theater efficiency, and reinforced the principle of shared decision-making. This low-cost intervention offers measurable clinical and economic benefits and could be adopted in other elective surgical pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.