ArticleCureus2026
Misleading Presentation of Multilesional Benign Pathologies in the Breast: A Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 41-year-old female presented to our service, referred by the oncology department for evaluation of multiple nodules in the right breast. Upon questioning, the patient reported that she had sought consultation for multiple dermal lesions present for approximately 20 years in the right areolar region. However, upon examination, the physician noted palpable breast nodules and requested imaging studies for better characterization. An excisional biopsy of one of the breast nodules was subsequently performed for histopathological analysis. Because the patient's primary concern was the longstanding dermal lesions, one of these was also excised and submitted for histopathological evaluation. The breast nodule was diagnosed as fibrocystic mastopathy, while the dermal lesion was identified as a keloid scar. Comprehensive multimodality breast imaging, including mammography, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced MRI, is essential for accurate characterization of palpable nodules, particularly when clinical findings and patient-reported symptoms are discordant. Radiologic-pathologic correlation is especially critical in the presence of multiple lesions of differing tissue origins to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of both dermal and breast parenchymal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.