ReviewCureus2026
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of the Suzuki Frame in Digital Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraarticular fractures of the phalanges and thumb base are challenging to manage due to the risks of stiffness and loss of motion. The Suzuki pins and rubbers traction system provides dynamic external fixation that maintains reduction while allowing early mobilisation. No prior systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) has comprehensively evaluated its outcomes. This study aimed to summarise radiographic union, functional recovery and complication rates to inform clinical decision-making. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 1994 to October 2025. Eligible studies included ≥5 patients with intraarticular phalangeal or thumb fractures managed using the Suzuki frame. Primary outcomes included range of motion (ROM), union rate and grip strength. Data extraction was performed in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, US), screening in Rayyan and analysis in OpenMetaAnalyst, using fixed or random effect models with 95% CIs and Cochran's Q and I² tests. Twelve studies (183 patients, 185 fractures) were included in the analysis. The pooled union rate was 97.8% (95% CI 0.95 - 1.00, p<0.001). Functional recovery was favourable; pooled proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) range of motion (RoM) was 89.6 degrees (95% CI 88.4 - 90.7, p<0.001). Distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) ROM was 66.0 degrees (95% CI 64.6 - 67.4, p<0.001), and grip strength was 81.2% (95% CI 78.3 - 84.0, p<0.001). Pin site infection rate was 10.3% (95% CI 0.0 - 0.2, p<0.001), and joint space narrowing was 5% (95% CI 0.0 - 0.1, p<0.05). Post-traumatic arthritis occurred in 2.7%. Pain was minimal (visual analogue scale (VAS) <2). The Suzuki traction system achieves high union, satisfactory ROM and low complication rates in intraarticular digital fractures. Maintaining traction for four to six weeks optimises healing. Its minimally invasive design enables early motion and supports functional recovery and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.