Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728483›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Spinal Subarachnoid Hematoma After Spinal Anesthesia: A Case Report and Literature-Aligned Review.

Mariana Machado, Patrícia Martins Lima, Cristiana Pinho, Margarida Barbosa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariana MachadoAnesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, PRT.
Patrícia Martins LimaAnesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, PRT.
Cristiana PinhoAnesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, PRT.
Margarida BarbosaAnesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal subarachnoid hematoma (SSH) is an infrequent but potentially devastating complication of spinal anesthesia (SA). Diagnosis may be challenging due to early nonspecific symptoms and the limited ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reliably differentiate subarachnoid from subdural or epidural bleeding, making timely recognition critical. We report a 72‑year‑old woman who underwent uneventful SA for orthopedic surgery and initially recovered without complications. On postoperative day 2, she developed acute dorsolumbar pain progressing rapidly to complete bilateral lower‑limb paralysis and hypoesthesia below T12. MRI suggested a large posterior epidural hematoma extending from T9 to L2 with an inferior component interpreted as a subdural hematoma at L3-L4. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis had been initiated 24 hours after surgery in accordance with current European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC)/European Society of Regional Anaesthesia (ESRA) guidelines. Urgent surgical decompression was performed approximately six hours after symptom onset. Intraoperatively, however, the hematoma was identified as an extensive SSH from T10 to L2, confirming a diagnosis that MRI had been unable to establish. A T10-L2 laminectomy with evacuation of the hematoma was completed successfully. Despite prompt recognition, guideline‑compliant anticoagulation timing, and rapid surgical intervention, the patient developed permanent neurological deficits. This case illustrates how SSH likely requires the coexistence of substantial bleeding and anatomical conditions that restrict cerebrospinal fluid circulation, enabling clot formation within the subarachnoid space. Typical clinical presentation includes acute back pain followed by rapidly progressive motor, sensory, and sphincter dysfunction. Prognosis is strongly influenced by the severity of initial neurological impairment and the urgency of decompression, with optimal outcomes associated with surgery performed within 6-12 hours of deficit onset. Given its rarity and potential for catastrophic outcomes even with protocol‑driven care, SSH must remain an important differential diagnosis in patients presenting with neurological deterioration after SA. This case reinforces the need for vigilant postoperative monitoring, immediate imaging when red‑flag symptoms arise, awareness of MRI limitations in compartmental differentiation, and timely multidisciplinary intervention.

Indexed as

complication of neuroaxial anesthesianeuroaxial anesthesianeurological complicationspinal anesthesiaspinal subarachnoid hematoma

Identifiers

PMID41728483
PMCPMC12917434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.