ArticleCureus2026
Real-World Outcomes of Efgartigimod in Adult Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efgartigimod (Vyvgart) is used in the management of myasthenia gravis (MG), but real-world data outside controlled trials, particularly regarding flexible dosing intervals and concomitant medication use, remain limited. The objective of this preliminary, single-center, hypothesis-generating case series was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of efgartigimod, characterize variability in treatment-free dosing intervals, and explore associations between dosing intervals and concomitant immunosuppressive medication use among adult patients with MG in routine clinical practice. This was a retrospective chart review of MG patients at a single academic neuromuscular center who were directly evaluated by the principal investigator. Demographics, treatment dates, dosing intervals, concomitant medications, and myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores were collected. Fixed- and mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between efgartigimod use and changes in prednisone or other immunosuppressant dosing. Nine patients were included (mean age 64 ± 18.1 years, 55.6% male). The average time between cycles was 47 days (SD = 46.5, CI = 34.98-59.01), with wide variability across patients. The average baseline MG-ADL was 8.56 and decreased by 4.44 at 60 days (SD = 3.43), 4.71 at six months (SD = 3.64), and 5.29 at 12 months (SD = 5.06). Reductions were statistically significant at all time points (p = 0.008, 0.016, and 0.031, respectively). Baseline dosing of prednisone, pyridostigmine, and mycophenolate mofetil did not systematically affect cycle length, but higher azathioprine doses were consistently associated with longer subsequent infusion intervals. Given the small sample size and single-center design, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary observations and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive conclusions. Efgartigimod was associated with significant improvements in MG-ADLs in this cohort, supporting its effectiveness under flexible, patient-centered dosing schedules. Findings suggest that concomitant azathioprine dosing may be linked to longer infusion intervals, potentially reflecting more stable disease or clinician comfort with extended cycles, although this requires further investigation. Larger, prospective studies are needed to define optimal scheduling strategies, long-term durability, and the potential for reducing polypharmacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.