ArticleCureus2026
Short-Term Effects of Workstyle Reform for Japanese Doctors on Their Surgical Productivity.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Workstyle Reform for Japanese Doctors Did Not Improve Surgical Productivity in the Long Term.JMA journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the workstyle reform, aimed at improving physician health and safety, achieved a secondary goal of enhancing surgical productivity by applying the Malmquist Index (MI) model. We hypothesized that the reform would lead to a significant improvement in surgical total factor productivity in the short term.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study at a university hospital, analyzing 1,557 surgical procedures performed by 72 surgeons from April 1 through May 31 in 2023 and 2024. A non-radial, non-oriented MI model was applied under variable returns-to-scale assumptions. Each decision-making unit (DMU) was defined as the most senior-ranking surgeon for a given procedure. Inputs included (1) the number of assisting physicians and (2) the duration of surgery from skin incision to closure. The output was defined as the surgical fee assigned to each procedure. Surgical procedures in 2023 were defined as before workstyle reform, and those in 2024 were after workstyle reform. Inputs and outputs were aggregated for each DMU per year. The primary outcome was the Malmquist Index, with secondary outcomes being the catch-up (CU) and frontier-shift (FS) effects.
resultsThere was no statistically significant change in overall surgical productivity between 2023 and 2024 (p = 0.39). Neither the catch-up effect nor the frontier-shift effect showed a significant deviation from zero.
conclusionsThe workstyle reform in 2024 in Japan did not lead to a measurable change in fee-based surgical productivity in its first two months at the tertiary hospital. Neither frontier-shift nor catch-up effect was significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.